fossil is interesting! what - if anything - you don't like about it Roderick?
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019, 8:51 am Roderick <hru...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jul 2019, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > > *IF* the OpenBSD devs ever wants to change SCMs--I said **IF**--then I > > root for Subversion. Subversion offers the following advantages: > > If wants to change just for changing, then there are reasons to select > something else? I realy do not understand this logic that drives this > discussion. > > What I like of CVS: rcs textfiles, transparency, no strange db. That > is a reason for which I would decide for CVS and nothing else for a > bigger project. > > I use fossil for my small programs, better said, misuse, because I > do not use it as a real SCM, but just for backuping history. And I > like it very much. > > Rodrigo > >
