Hi Stuart thanks for the reply On 7/12/19 1:20 PM, owner-m...@openbsd.org wrote: >> hypothetical ipv4 Address and ipv6 prefix from zen: >> ND Prefix: aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 >> PD Prefix: 1111:2222:3333::/48 >> IPv4 Address: 12.34.56.78 (Subnet mask 255.255.255.255) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> fw1 em0: 192.168.2.2 (lan) >> fw1 em1: 12.34.56.78 (wan) i have taken carp out of the configuration which leaves me with:
/etc/hostname.em0 mtu 1508 inet 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 NONE /etc/hostname.em1 mtu 1508 inet 12.34.56.78 255.255.255.255 NONE inet6 autoconf -autoconfprivacy -soii /etc/hostname.pppoe mtu 1500 inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.1 pppoedev em1 authproto chap authname "XXX@isp" authkey "XXX" up dest 0.0.0.1 inet6 eui64 !/sbin/route add default -ifp pppoe0 0.0.0.1 !/sbin/route add -inet6 default -ifp pppoe0 fe80::%pppoe0 -priority 8 /etc/rad.conf interface em0 dhcpcd to be added > If you need DHCPv6-PD then don't hardcode the addresses on the > inside interfaces, just let PD fetch them.(For the UK ISPs I'm most familiar > with, zen seems to need PD otherwise > they don't route the block to me, at least in the config they've got > on my user account by inside interfaces do you mean the lan facing nic on the firewall and any tun interfaces ? i am on zen also and will have a look at dhcpcd > question 5 >>> do i need to put -autoconfprivacy -soii in the nics or should i remove it. > Don't use autoconf on interfaces where you run rad(8), that is like > running dhclient and dhcpd on the same interface. > so remove autoconf from em0 ? should i be using the mtu option in rad.conf to ensure that all nodes on a link use the same MTU value i.e. 1508 ? could you send examples of the following files to compare with mine for any misconfigurations on my side please. wan hostname file lan hostname file pppoe hostname file rad.conf dhcpcd.conf thanks shadrock
