I am sorry for NOT reading my content again before posting it, my fault.
On 16.06.19 06:35, li...@wrant.com wrote:
Sat, 15 Jun 2019 23:52:18 +0200 ms <m...@it-infrastrukturen.org>
Now a day backdors are already on the silicon level (inside chips). They
are declared as debugging interfaces..
Must have happened around the time when school dropouts went to business.
What do you want to say? Do you have experience in chip design?
Probably not ..
It looks like at least the reengineering of the frimware an it is
analyzing of the code could increase security wholes
Wonderful day for some misspelled general Failure statements.. is it not?
"It looks like at least the reengineering of the firmware
and the analysis of the code could increase the security, to avoid
security wholes"
I am curious if someone on this list had tried to do it and had achieved
helpfull results..
No, but if you need an English textbook, computers are not your strength.
Obviously you missed the topic of the thread and the hardware specifics..
Or at the least just try to say something OpenBSD related for any points.
The OpenBSD related point is, that people are using OpenBSD because of
security and it does not really make sense to run OpenBSD on unsecure
hardware / firmware.
Have you got it now?
