On Mar 11, 2019 5:20 PM, Evan Silberman <e...@jklol.net> wrote: > > Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:29:41PM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote: > > > Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > Index: httpd.conf.5 > > > > =================================================================== > > > > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/httpd.conf.5,v > > > > retrieving revision 1.103 > > > > diff -u -r1.103 httpd.conf.5 > > > > --- httpd.conf.5 19 Feb 2019 11:37:26 -0000 1.103 > > > > +++ httpd.conf.5 11 Mar 2019 19:05:57 -0000 > > > > @@ -155,7 +155,10 @@ > > > > .Xr patterns 7 . > > > > .El > > > > .Pp > > > > -Followed by a block of options that is enclosed in curly brackets: > > > > +It is followed by a block of directives and values, enclosed in curly > > > > brackets. > > > > +Directives which take multiple > > > > +.Ar option > > > > +values may also group these options in curly brackets. > > > > > > This is better than mine but I don't think the "also" has a referent > > > here. Maybe: > > > "Directives which take multiple option values may be repeated or may > > > group the > > > options in curly brackets." This excludes the possible interpretation > > > that e.g. > > > 'log access "acces_log" error "error_log"' is valid syntax. > > > > > > > "also" because we just said that directives and values are enclosed in > > curly brackets. so "also" meaning "in the same way as we just showed > > you". > > You're right, reading the context more carefully this makes perfect sense. > > > > "repeated" is confusing i think (like you would specify the same option > > value twice). > > Fair enough. I have no further quibbles. > > Evan Silberman >
Not that it matters much, but I like it better too. :)
