Programmer <program...@verisimilitudes.net> wrote: > There don't seem to be any Common Lisp libraries available as > packages. I'd be interested in packaging the most common and mature > Common Lisp libraries, but I'm not certain who I'd discuss this with. > > I'd appreciate any help with getting started contributing to OpenBSD.
hello What software requires porting common lisp libraries? There is no point in doing ports for CL libraries if it's not used by a port. We already have a few CL software in ports, and none requires ported libs: - net/clic uses no lib - sysutils/cl-launch uses no lib - sysutils/reed-alert uses no lib - x11/spectrwm uses no lib - x11/stumpwm uses 2 libs which are downloaded before compiling the port and then, stumpwm is compiled as a binary, including the libs I already been thinking about packaging some libs but I found no software to port to use them. If a software would requires too much libs, it may be easier (as we do for go packages) to use quicklisp to create a folder embedding the libraries, and use that tarball for compiling it. I also had patches for lang/sbcl and lang/ecl to add a system wide folder into the asdf loading path in case we wanted to port libs see https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=147983440719241&w=2
