On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:01:38 -0800
Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Antonios Anastasiadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been wondering what are the openbsd team's long term-plans (if
> > any at all,of course) regarding future smp support.
> > I am aware that openbsd currently supports smp under the big kernel
> > lock, which offers some advantages for userland applications but
> > generally things like interrupt and io load don't scale at all.
> > I understand it is an enormous task, judging by the other os'es
> > struggle to remove the bkl by various techniques.
> > What are the developers thinking about the future regarding this
> > matter, and what are their opinions about the other os'es paths as
> > well.
>
> i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
> for threads.
>
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
--
"God is real, unless declared integer."
