On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 10:15 -0500, Vijay Sankar wrote: > Here is my df -h output -- Just as an FYI I was testing some > workarounds for the samba virusfilter issue and then made some > mistakes that screwed up KDE etc. So decided to build it from > scratch > and have about 5000 packages built right now with the following > disk > usage. > > $ df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/sd0a 1005M 102M 852M 11% / > /dev/sd0l 3.9G 1.8G 2.0G 48% /builds > /dev/sd0k 127G 1.3G 119G 1% /home > /dev/sd0d 3.9G 7.2M 3.7G 0% /tmp > /dev/sd0f 5.9G 1.9G 3.8G 33% /usr > /dev/sd0g 2.0G 185M 1.7G 10% /usr/X11R6 > /dev/sd0h 19.7G 9.4G 9.3G 50% /usr/local > /dev/sd0j 5.9G 3.3G 2.3G 59% /usr/obj > /dev/sd0i 2.0G 990M 929M 52% /usr/src > /dev/sd0e 31.5G 57.9M 29.9G 0% /var > /dev/sd0m 243G 83.7G 147G 36% /usr/ports
Thanks, this is good info. I am trying to find out about /usr/xenocara if it is still needed and also whether it's still recommended to build from source and track -stable or whether syspatch does away with that. What is the recommended http server these days? I remember the transition from apache to nginx. What's the conventional wisdom? My plan for this box is sftp, http, and minidlna server. Thank you, /jl
