The FAQ6 section for VMM Networking incorrectly specified the range for Shared 
Address Space. RFC6598 section 7 calls out 100.64.0.0/10

As far as I can tell, it’s just the FAQ that misstates this. The vm manpages 
seem to all call out the correct range

--- faq6.html   Wed Apr  4 06:19:18 2018
+++ faq6.html.patched   Wed Apr  4 06:20:15 2018
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@
       (<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598";>RFC6598</a>) are similar
       to private addresses in that they are not globally routable, but are
       intended to be used on equipment that can perform address translation.
-      The address space is <tt>10.64.0.0/10</tt>.
+      The address space is <tt>100.64.0.0/10</tt>.
 </ul>
 
 <h3>Option 1 - VMs only need to talk to the host and each other</h3>
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@
 <a href="pf/nat.html">Network Address Translation</a>:
 
 <blockquote><pre>
-match out on egress from 10.64.0.0/10 to any nat-to (egress)
+match out on egress from 100.64.0.0/10 to any nat-to (egress)
 </pre></blockquote>
 
 Reload the pf ruleset and the VM(s) can now connect to the internet.

Reply via email to