On 2018-02-15, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 02/15/2018 01:34 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2018/02/15 13:27, Kaya Saman wrote: >>> >>> On 02/15/2018 12:13 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>>> On 2018-02-15, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> does queueing still function with pfstat? As far as I'm aware it still >>>>> uses the old altq method which has long been abandoned. >>>> you're correct, pfstat hasn't been updated to follow changes in PF for >>>> a long time. the only change in pfstat since 2007 has been adding the >>>> -f flag to copy/clean the database. >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks Stuart for the confirmation. >>> >>> >>> Hmm looks like this might be a feature request to Daniel then..... or >>> someone who's working on pfstat :-) >> Nobody is visibly working on pfstat. >> >> If anyone did want to work on queue monitoring I'd encourage them to >> look at adding to snmpd instead (it will need a custom MIB). There are >> plenty of things that can monitor SNMP stats, and as it's in base, >> there are no real worries about ABI getting out of sync. >> > Interesting! > > I think I agree with SNMP. It would be great if pf could be monitored > through net-snmp or the built in snmp. To be able to see what PF is > doing in something like Observium, Zabbix, Cacti or any other SNMP based > monitoring software would be a really nice asset.
It can already be monitored to some extent, base snmpd does already support a number of things in OPENBSD-PF-MIB, but not queues yet.
