hello and thanks

that's sounds cool. atm im reading a bit about carp and arp balancing.
but i think, thats my solution. 500 MBit/s would be enough for my
needs. 

so now, ive to get some boxes and do some tests... the lan party i spoke
from is still far away (in early august i think). after this, i will
post some links to cacti network graphs and some test results.

i will start work in a few weeks. if i get some further questions, i
will post them here...

thanks

marco


Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 09:50 -0500 schrieb Jason Dixon:
> On Jan 29, 2006, at 6:22 AM, Marco Fretz wrote:
> 
> > hello there
> >
> > we are planning a medium lan party with about 200 - 300 clients.  
> > it's a
> > normal gamer lan party but there will be a lot of traffic.
> >
> > we will habe about 6 subnets (like 10.5.0.0/24, 10.6.0.0/24, and so  
> > on)
> > that we have to route under each other. if we get a good sponsor we  
> > may
> > habe some layer 3 cisco swiches that can do wirespeed routing.
> >
> > but i  dont think so... i may have to get some 3 GHz Intel P4 Boxes
> > (About 1 GB Memory) and do the VLAN Routing on these openbsd boxes.
> >
> > will i get about 1GBit/s throughput with such a box?
> > is it better to use a gigabit ethernet card for each subnet or  
> > should i
> > get the vlans on one intel card?
> >
> > is it better to route all vlans on one box or should i split up the
> > routing on about 3 boxes?
> 
> I just deployed a similar setup using a pair of OpenBSD/CARP servers  
> on inexpensive servers and a cluster of Cisco 2950s.  Each server is  
> an Iron Systems A320R with a 2.0 GHz Celeron, 256MB memory, 64bit/ 
> 66MHz PCI-X slot, dual onboard Intel 1000BaseT, and onboard CF-to-IDE  
> adapter in place of the original SATA drive.  A 64bit SysKonnect  
> 1000BaseT in the PCI slot and handles pfsync traffic.
> 
> The internal em interfaces are trunked on Cisco 1000BaseT GBICs.   
> Each router handles 10 internal VLANs on carp interfaces.  My iperf  
> tests maxed out at ~500Mbps;  a faster processor and more bus would  
> likely yield much higher throughput.  Still not bad for around $700  
> per server.
> 
> --
> Jason Dixon
> DixonGroup Consulting
> http://www.dixongroup.net

Reply via email to