On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:44:12AM -0700, webmas...@bennettconstruction.us wrote: > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: What would you like to see in upcoming PF tutorials? > > From: "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <pe...@bsdly.net> > > Date: Thu, December 14, 2017 2:27 pm > > To: misc@openbsd.org > > > > > > We're in the process of preparing for upcoming conferences with updates > > to the ever-in-progress PF tutorial. > > > > If you have thoughts on what you would like to see in a tutorial session > > and would like to share them either with me or the list, we would love > > to hear from you. > > > > The slides from last year's session at BSDCan can be found here: > > https://home.nuug.no/~peter/pftutorial/ - we're basically looking > > for ways to make those sessions more useful (the last one wasn't > > awful we hear, but there's always room for improvement). > > > > - Peter > > -- > > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team > > http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ > > "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" > > delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds. > > I have to admit that I simply cannot follow the pf > guide at this point. > When I started using OpenBSD, I had no problems with > getting spamd and NAT to work. The guide uses variables instead of > example IP addresses and I get > confused which computer is inside, outside, etc. > I would really like something that makes it clear which connection is > where. > All of my recent attempts at NAT have just failed to work. > Spamd was working fine, but it stopped working completely. > It would also be nice to know if anything can't work and why. > > This might be helpful for presentations, but I > sure would like it for the online guide. > > Chris Bennett > > >
I would like to see more indepth discussion of queues, anchors, and authpf. I suspect either of the three could probably fill an entire pf tutorial.
