On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 3:46 PM, <webmas...@bennettconstruction.us> wrote: > > > Wait, you previously said your problem was with symlinks *permissions* > but > > now you're saying *ownership*! I can confirm that restore(8) didn't > > preserve the permissions (thus the patch I sent), but as long as you ran > it > > with sufficient privilege it should have always restored symlink > > *ownership*. Was that a slip of the tongue/fingers? > > Sorry, I was just blathering about a different unrelated problem I had with > website symlinks. My bad. >
Heh, no problem!
