On 25/10/17(Wed) 12:01, Stefan Sperling wrote: > [...] > More help on fuse support would certainly be welcome, I think. > It has not been actively maintained for some time.
Exactly. There are many way to help. It's not necessarily hard. Helg Bredow has been looking at some issues recently. But it would be great to see more regression tests, so make sure our libfuse matches what the original 2.6 version does. More documentation/man pages would also be welcome. Fuzzing the library would also help catch bugs. Alternatively changing the API to match a newer version would also be welcomed.