I will have a look into this tonight and see if I can figure it out with that.
Thank you > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Running OpenVPN as a client breaks SSH access into same box? Is > it a problem with default route being changed? > Local Time: 24 October 2017 10:28 PM > UTC Time: 24 October 2017 20:28 > From: danj+o...@chown.me > To: misc@openbsd.org > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 16:25:08 -0400, > ["tec...@protonmail.com](mailto:%22tec...@protonmail.com)" > tec...@protonmail.com wrote: > >> It's currently a bit tricky for me getting into the box physically. >> If only I had SSH access ha! >> I'm almost 100% certain that returning packets are being routed over >> the tun0 (new default route) interface instead of em0. >> >> http://man.openbsd.org/pf.conf#reply-to should help you >> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: Running OpenVPN as a client breaks SSH access into >>> same box? Is it a problem with default route being changed? Local >>> Time: 24 October 2017 10:13 PM UTC Time: 24 October 2017 20:13 >>> From: kgo...@gmail.com >>> To: tec...@protonmail.com tec...@protonmail.com >>> you are more likely to receive help if you post the output of >>> "ifconfig -a" and "netstat -nr" commands. >>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:06 PM, tec...@protonmail.com >>> tec...@protonmail.com wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I have a very very basic setup. Not using any other pf rules other >>>> than what comes default with 6.2-Release and almost every other >>>> release. Running OpenVPN works without a problem - able to connect >>>> as a client to a remote OpenVPN server. Everything is properly >>>> routing, verified by checking my IP. Problem is that as soon as >>>> OpenVPN is running, I cannot SSH in to my OpenBSD machine from any >>>> other machine on the Lan. Now, I'm guessing this has something to >>>> do with the default route being changed automatically by OpenVPN >>>> but I am still a total newbie with routing and pf so I have not a >>>> clue how to fix this, especially in any sort of manner which I can >>>> safely assume it to be the correct way. Can someone tell me how to >>>> resolve this? Thank
