> On 19. Oct 2017, at 06:23, flipchan <flipc...@riseup.net> wrote: > > Yeah blindly follow the flow of the others , DONT THINK SO
That doesn’t explain the reasoning WHY the newer awk is not used. >> On October 19, 2017 4:25:09 AM GMT+02:00, Andras Farkas >> <deepbluemist...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On the 6.2 release page, and confirmed in the source code, one can see >> The system includes the following major components from outside >> suppliers: >> Awk Aug 10, 2011 version >> This turns out to be one release behind upstream, where the latest >> release is from December 20 2012: a quick check shows that >> DragonFlyBSD, FreeBSD, and NetBSD all use this version. >> >> Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why OpenBSD uses the 2011 >> release? Niels
