Hi, the license is your choice ;-)
But we use ISC for new code in OpenBSD and I also use for all other open source code these days. See: http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=1.3&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup http://www.openbsd.org/goals.html And: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_license Note that the mentioned Atheros drivers in the Linux kernel are ISC-licensed because they were derived from my ar5k drivers in OpenBSD. Long time ago. http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/Atheros/#Licensing Reyk > Am 04.08.2017 um 05:11 schrieb Siju George <sgeorge...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > I have a git repo > > https://github.com/sgeorge > > where I populate mainly contents about docker. > > I want this information to be available to all without discrimination. > > Which is the best licence I can give them? > > BSD or ISC or MIT or any other? > > Heard Reyk is not using BSD licence for his drivers but ISC > > Thus the confusion in my mind. > > Please advise > > Thank you :-) > > Siju Oommen George > >
