On 2017-08-02 15:17:17, and...@quickstick.net wrote: > First of all, big thanks to Theo for his strong leadership and to all the > past and present devs !!! Have a great week ahead !!! > > > --- > > Just a little FWIW from a Lenovo T440s ... > > --- > > dmesg | sort | uniq -c > > 1 3834:intel_uncore_check_errors] *ERROR* Unclaimed register before > interrupt > 30 error: [drm:pid31067:intel_uncore_check_errors] *ERROR* Unclaimed > register before interrupt > 124 error: [drm:pid45200:intel_uncore_check_errors] *ERROR* Unclaimed > register before interrupt > 474 error: [drm:pid53834:intel_uncore_check_errors] *ERROR* Unclaimed > register before interrupt > 48 error: [drm:pid76233:intel_uncore_check_errors] *ERROR* Unclaimed > register before interrupt > 9 error: [drm:pid77807:intel_uncore_check_errors] *ERROR* Unclaimed > register before interrupt > 26 error: [drm:pid85895:intel_uncore_check_errors] *ERROR* Unclaimed > register before interrupt >
I see the same thing on a T440p. I reported it on tech@ when a call for testing was put out, so the developers involved should be well aware of the issue. The above errors don't seem to be causing any negative effects, and the new drm code is still being worked on and improved, so I'm content to simply wait for progress to be made or until another patch and/or call for testing is made where I can be involved more actively. A few extra lines of harmless dmesg spam are a small price to pay for having all the work the developers put in to bring newer drm code and Skylake support to OpenBSD. I extend my own thanks to all those involved in such a feat. -- Bryan
