I was not aware that the difference is 340%. So I guess the main advantage is the license? Or is clang technically (binaries, debug) better?
Am 20.04.17 um 03:42 schrieb Theo de Raadt: >> I'm using current on amd64 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, >> 3411.91 MHz) >> >> I noticed that with clang it needs 109 minutes for "make build" and >> before with gcc 32 minutes. >> >> Is this a normal behavior? > > For sure. Why the surprise? >
