>From your link:
AMD replied: "Thanks for the inquiry. Currently we do not have
plans to release source code but you make a good argument for
reasons to do so. We will evaluate and find a way to work with
security vendors and the community to everyone's benefit." The
product manager for AMD, AMD_james, continued in response to a
follow-up comment that claims AMD is "not considering it all
but only want to appease the potential buyers." AMD_james
replied: "Thanks for the feedback. Please believe me that this
has CEO level attention and AMD is investigating the steps and
resources necessary to support this. It is not the work of a
minute, so please bear with us as we define what we can do."
In other words: the fourth millennium will arrive first.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:47:06 +0100 (CET)
I love BSDs <lampsh...@poczta.fm> wrote:
> >In order for me to trust AMD's implementation, they first need to can
> >that ridiculous Platform "Security" Processor. It is as useless and
> >dangerous as Intel Management Engine, running unknown code.
>
> Who know, maybe they are going to open source their firmware?
>
https://news.slashdot.org/story/17/03/10/2048236/message-for-amd-open-psp-wil
l-improve-security-hinder-intel
>
> Anyway I recommend "Wait and see".
