hi

what kind of DSL you have ( DSL or VDSL2 ) ?

if you use VDSL2 is AUTO MTU Active ? ( Mother Interface
have to be set to MTU 1508 , and no MTU Setting das the PPPOE
Interface.)

what says pfctl -si ( Line congestion  )

what say sysctl -a | grep ifq ?

holger




> Stuart
>
> Thanks for the reply
>
> At this point it appears a specific LAN client “PS4” is responsible
> for a
> high number of device interrupts.
>
> Hoping to clarify if interrupts In excess of “3000” can cause PPPOE
> timeouts.
>
> #############################################################################
> #
> Lan Streaming cat5 no switch
>
> procs    memory       page                    disk traps          cpu
> r b w    avm          fre  flt  re  pi  po  fr  sr sd0  int   sys   cs us
> sy
> id
> 1 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 6872     7   10  0  9 91
> 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 2163     7    9  0  4 96
> 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 1921     9   11  0  2 98
> 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 1943     6    9  0  3 97
> 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 1705     6    9  0  3 97
> 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 1849     8   10  0  3 97
> 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 2276     6    9  0  4 96
>
> ############################################################################
> Wlan Streaming
>
> procs    memory       page                    disk traps          cpu
> r b w    avm     fre        flt  re  pi  po  fr  sr sd0  int   sys   cs us
> sy
> id
> 1 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  368     7   10  0  1 99
> 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  365     8   10  0  2 98
> 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  355    10    9  0  1 99
> 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  362     9   10  0  2 98
> 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  356     8   10  0  1 99
> 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  361    10   10  0  1 99
> 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  365     9   10  0  2 98
> 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  383     8   10  0  1 99
>
> #############################################################################
> No Lan or Wlan traffic
>
> procs    memory       page                    disk traps          cpu
> r b w    avm     fre         flt  re  pi  po  fr  sr sd0  int   sys   cs
> us sy
> id
> 1 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   24     8   10  0  0
> 100
> 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   23     6    9  0  0
> 100
> 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   28     6    9  0  0
> 100
> 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   24     8   10  0  0
> 100
> 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   22     7    9  0  0
> 100
> 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   25     8   10  0  0
> 100
> 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   24     6    9  0  0
> 100
>
> Regards
> Patrick
>
>> On Dec 15, 2016, at 5:05 AM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-12-15, Patrick Dohman <patrick_doh...@centurylink.net> wrote:
>>> Stuart
>>>
>>> Please see below for more info:
>>>
>>> Please note the 5.7 dmesg is subsequent to a reboot.
>>
>> Thanks. I was wondering about a bug with LCP echoes I accidentally
>> introduced that made it into 5.9 (fixed for 6.0).
>>
>> Nothing stands out from what you've sent. Some possibilities:
>>
>> - connection somewhere between the APU and the ISP really is dropping
>> out
>> (are you using the same cable for the different locations you placed the
> APU
>> in? could a cable be bad? check for errors on the ethernet interface)
>>
>> - machine too busy to handle traffic - maybe tail -f /var/log/messages
>> in
> the
>> background while "vmstat -w 10" or something is running (maybe under
> "script"),
>> look for the timeouts in the output and see what cpu is doing at the
>> time
>>
>>> pass out quick on egress inet6 proto { tcp, udp } from {
>>> (pppoe0:network),
>>> (athn0:network), (re2:network) } modulate state
>>
>> btw using (...) causes an extra address lookup to be done when the rule
>> is evaluated (i.e. when a packet doesn't match existing state) - you may
> need
>> this for pppoe0 but you can save a bit of cpu with
>>
>> pass out quick on egress inet6 proto { tcp, udp } from {
>> (pppoe0:network),
>> athn0:network, re2:network } modulate state
>>
>> (and same for the v4 rule)
>>
>>> ### --- Optional Runtime Options --- ###
>>> set optimization conservative
>>
>> not likely to be the problem, but you're pretty unlikely to need that.

Reply via email to