>From all discussions: 1) a solution looking for a problem 2) the problems github tries to address are not considered urgent nor important problems by OpenBSD developers 3) migration cost/benefit is not worth it - and using 2 different methods of VC take away focus from the team".
On Sunday, 7 August 2016, Jack J. Woehr <j...@well.com> wrote: > Ingo Schwarze wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:44:58PM +0200: >> >> Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site? >>> >> As one of the OpenBSD developers, i don't know and frankly i don't >> care. You certainly shouldn't trust it in any way. >> > > It seems this discussion has gone on quite a while without stating the > obvious: > > 1. The developers are happy with CVS. > 2. As is, OpenBSD has full goddawmitey control of their source repository > whereas on GitHub it would belong to a corporation. > > Doesn't that simply end the discussion right there? > > -- > Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of > www.well.com/~jax # thinking, a way of skeptically interrogating the > universe > www.softwoehr.com # with a fine understanding of human fallibility. - > Carl Sagan
