On 20/06/16 05:07, li...@wrant.com wrote:
From this, I gained understanding that past emails and decisions, based on them are not always valid for current emails (wink Ivan). Different decisions happen with each case, independently careful attention to all no matter how minor detail it may seem. Every contribution counts, and is reviewed and assessed for quality. My *mistake* was to misjudge and actually demonstrate quick memory by correlating *past* email, got that. If you think you can add more to this, please do, I would appreciate it.
Since you are not representing the project or the developers (me neither), we would all appreciate if you stop responding like you do. The problem is not wrong memory/quick decision but answering like you are representing someone else instead of your self.
You are confusing people here, please stop doing so. G
