On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:25:45AM +0100, trebol55...@yandex.ru wrote: > mg(1) > > […] It is compatible with emacs because > there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or > vi(1). > > Where is the troll, where is the silly troll? >
Given enough time, a UNIX user's likelihood to use one of the two approaches 1. Why not support both sane configurations out of the box?
