> > Unfortunately systrace overhead can be significant for monitoring > > complex programs but it could potentially be useful as a part of a > > (HIPS or system intrusion or malfunction detection for a secure > > server). hmmm, assuming pledge doesn't kill the offending process first, > > haha. > > systrace and pledge did not work together. So that's balony.
how do you mean? what happens on 5.9 when you use systrace with pledged programs? Does cpu usage go through the roof by any chance? That would explain why I have had to disable it to avoid waiting so long for systraced desktop programs. Thanks -- KISSIS - Keep It Simple So It's Securable