On 25/04/16(Mon) 11:35, Kim Zeitler wrote:
> Hello Martin
> 
> 
> On 04/25/16 11:12, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >On 25/04/16(Mon) 10:47, Kim Zeitler wrote:
> 
> >>He is running a carp interface on top of a vlan interface. In this scenario
> >>the carp interface can not be pinged but the vlan interfaces can.
> >
> >Do you mean the CARP node does not answer to ping with a destination
> >address on the carp(4) interfaces?  Is it for MASTER, BACKUP or both?
> >
> em2 (no ip) ---> vlan100 (192.168.150.200) ---> carp2 (192.168.150.1)
>             \
>              --> vlan101 (192.168.151.200) ---> carp3 (192.168.151.1)
> 
> This is my setup
> if I ping either address assigned to carp2 or carp3 from a host on the
> network I do not get an answer, pinging the vlan address answers.

When doing so, please use "# tcpdump -nvei carp2 icmp" to see if the
echo request/reply reach/leave the interface.

> One node is clearly in MASTER, the other in BACKUP, demote works.

The routing table correspond to which node?  MASTER or BACKUP?  There's
something really weird in it, the RTF_CLONING routes are done.

Could you include your whole routing table?  Do you have an entry for
the machine initiating the ping?

> The host also has two further carp interfaces sitting directly on a physical
> interface which work as expected.

Then why excluding this information from the table?

Reply via email to