On 25/04/16(Mon) 11:35, Kim Zeitler wrote: > Hello Martin > > > On 04/25/16 11:12, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > >On 25/04/16(Mon) 10:47, Kim Zeitler wrote: > > >>He is running a carp interface on top of a vlan interface. In this scenario > >>the carp interface can not be pinged but the vlan interfaces can. > > > >Do you mean the CARP node does not answer to ping with a destination > >address on the carp(4) interfaces? Is it for MASTER, BACKUP or both? > > > em2 (no ip) ---> vlan100 (192.168.150.200) ---> carp2 (192.168.150.1) > \ > --> vlan101 (192.168.151.200) ---> carp3 (192.168.151.1) > > This is my setup > if I ping either address assigned to carp2 or carp3 from a host on the > network I do not get an answer, pinging the vlan address answers.
When doing so, please use "# tcpdump -nvei carp2 icmp" to see if the echo request/reply reach/leave the interface. > One node is clearly in MASTER, the other in BACKUP, demote works. The routing table correspond to which node? MASTER or BACKUP? There's something really weird in it, the RTF_CLONING routes are done. Could you include your whole routing table? Do you have an entry for the machine initiating the ping? > The host also has two further carp interfaces sitting directly on a physical > interface which work as expected. Then why excluding this information from the table?
