On April 7, 2016 10:40:24 PM GMT+02:00, Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> 
wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:13:02PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:35:52PM +0100:
>> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:15:01PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote:
>> 
>> >> Change "super user" to "superuser".
>> 
>> > hmm. you have the weight of the man pages behind you, since they
>> > overwhelmingly use "superuser".
>> 
>> In that case, ...
>> 
>> > the trouble is, i don;t think "super
>> > user" is wrong, and i'm reluctant to do this...
>> > 
>> > i've made changes like this before, when we have a real majority of
>> > spelling leading one way. but they always creep back in. i think we
>> > should just accept that we can spell things more than one way
>sometimes.
>> > 
>> > but then grep ;(
>> > 
>> > jmc, indecisive...
>> 
>>  ... just commit it, in particular when the work was already done.
>> 
>> Sure, it's not a big deal either way, and it doesn't do much harm
>> if a few spelling variants creep back in, no need to waste a lot
>> of time paying attention that they don't, but if we can improve
>> consistency almost for free, why not?
>> 
>> It can also help developers who look for spelling help in existing
>> pages if they find consistent usage.  That tends to reduce the time
>> spent trying to figure out whether there is a preferred form.  On
>> the other hand, consistency doesn't slow down people who don't care
>> as long as we don't yell at them.
>> 
>> Yours,
>>   Ingo
>> 
>
>hi.
>
>as far as i'm concerned, "super user" is not wrong. that's the rub. we
>have lots of alternate spellings in english, and i don;t see the point
>of trying to enforce one or the other. if they were spelled differently
>within the same page, then yes, fair enough.

I can't help comparing "superman" to "super man". It's a role or name which we 
seem to prefer - "the superuser" - rather than a great person with a login - "a 
super user". I'm sure the English language is flexible or ambiguous enough to 
prove me wrong, but that's my 2 cents anyway. 

/Alexander 

>
>for me, there's not a clear enough benefit to make the change. and i
>don;t like to somehow enforce spelling in a particular way.
>
>jmc
>
>> 
>> > > Index: src/share/man/man4/pty.4
>> > >
>===================================================================
>> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/pty.4,v
>> > > retrieving revision 1.21
>> > > diff -u -p -r1.21 pty.4
>> > > --- src/share/man/man4/pty.4     21 Nov 2015 08:04:20 -0000      1.21
>> > > +++ src/share/man/man4/pty.4     7 Apr 2016 19:12:07 -0000
>> > > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ device nodes following the naming conven
>> > >  .Ox .
>> > >  Since
>> > >  .Pa ptm
>> > > -impersonates the super user for some operations it needs to
>perform
>> > > +impersonates the superuser for some operations it needs to
>perform
>> > >  to complete the allocation of a pseudo terminal, the
>> > >  .Pa /dev
>> > > -directory must also be writeable by the super user.
>> > > +directory must also be writeable by the superuser.
>> > > 
>> > > Index: src/share/man/man5/login.conf.5
>> > >
>===================================================================
>> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/login.conf.5,v
>> > > retrieving revision 1.62
>> > > diff -u -p -r1.62 login.conf.5
>> > > --- src/share/man/man5/login.conf.5      30 Mar 2016 06:58:06
>-0000  1.62
>> > > +++ src/share/man/man5/login.conf.5      7 Apr 2016 19:12:07 -0000
>> > > @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ to indicate if the user is in group whee
>> > >  Some authentication types require the user to be in group wheel
>when using
>> > >  the
>> > >  .Xr su 1
>> > > -program to become super user.
>> > > +program to become superuser.
>> > >  .El
>> > >  .Pp
>> > >  When the authentication program is executed,
>> > > 
>> > > Index: src/usr.sbin/cron/crontab.1
>> > >
>===================================================================
>> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/cron/crontab.1,v
>> > > retrieving revision 1.33
>> > > diff -u -p -r1.33 crontab.1
>> > > --- src/usr.sbin/cron/crontab.1  26 Oct 2015 15:50:06 -0000      1.33
>> > > +++ src/usr.sbin/cron/crontab.1  7 Apr 2016 19:12:07 -0000
>> > > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ be listed in the
>> > >  .Pa /var/cron/cron.deny
>> > >  file in order to use
>> > >  .Nm .
>> > > -If neither of these files exists then only the super user
>> > > +If neither of these files exists then only the superuser
>> > >  will be allowed to use
>> > >  .Nm .
>> > >  .Em NOTE :

Reply via email to