On 03/31/2016 11:45 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:44:58AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > [...] >> I generally reject the addition of security knobs, and push towards >> making the security choice mandatory, as early as possible. We are >> not quite in the position of making this choice. (Maybe a ports >> developer can list some programs that require WX memory today) > > There is an external project for Arch Linux which keeps a list of the > programs incompatible with PaX's equivalent to W^X. > > https://github.com/thestinger/paxd/blob/master/paxd.conf > > The programs marked with "m" are incompatible.
Does the PaX implementation reject alias mappings? Thanks, Florian
