On March 8, 2016 12:41:09 AM GMT+01:00, Jiri B <ji...@devio.us> wrote: >On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:32:16AM +0100, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote: >> I'm using softraid_crypto for full disk encryption for about one year >> now. I used this on a low end Core2Duo and noticed absolutely *no* >> performance hit. I also use this on a newer platform and, again, no >> performance problems. It's stable too, no issues on booting. >> I know some high intensive servers/routers and old machines with old >hard >> drivers can have serious performance decrease due to this, but this >> could be at least a option on installer, I think. >> The developers have any arguments against this? Why not? I think this >is >> a great security improvement, specially for a notebook user. > >Probably nobody has yet sent good solution for the installer. >You got the source, read it, understand it, get idea how autoinstall >works, check archives which kind of "improvements" were discussed or >rejected, then... maybe cook a diff.
There have been quite a few suggestions, with everyone feeling confident about their diff, but never getting to the point of being committed. Some quite important bits are also missing in softraid, like post-boot auto reassembly. /Alexander
