On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:29:48AM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote: > Thank you much, Claudio! That was the ticket. I had put my depend on mpe0 > in the wrong place. I was mostly using your mpls example. Dumb questions: > Why do you not create a default route in rdomain 1 on the 2nd PE in your > mpls example network? Why do you not have network 0.0.0.0/0 on the 2nd PE? > Thanks for helping me with my understanding gaps. >
>From the top of my memory the idea is that the 2nd PE gets the default route from the 1st PE similar to a client connecting via MPLS VPN to a ISP. Does this make sense? -- :wq Claudio
