Tinker [ti...@openmailbox.org] wrote: > On 2016-02-28 05:26, Karel Gardas wrote: > >Open firmware? What do you mean by that precisely? > > Or just as little firmware as possible, just to minimize that as attack > vector. > > >Anyway, while asking such question it would also help if you tell > >something about intended usage scenario of such box(es). fw?/app > >server?/storage?/nas? etc. > > Network infrastructure, so, among those categories it would be FW. > > > What hardware is advisable here? >
PC Engines APU uses open source CoreBoot. I wouldn't be surprised if the CoreBoot load still includes binary-only support for AMD's remote management stuff (similar to Intel ME).
