--On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:49:30 AM -0600 Chris Bennett <chrisbenn...@bennettconstruction.us> wrote:
> I do see that lpc, lpq, lprm are dinosaurs and have to be made extinct > and replaced with something more functional with more information output > and better capabilities. Whatever changes may happen under the hood, I would like to see at least the basic operations of lpr, lpq, and lprm remain available under those names, using the existing syntax. I'm no fan of CUPS, but I get by with it on linux because of the lpr compatibility shim. Devin
