On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Amit Kulkarni <amitk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> > wrote: > >> On 2015-12-24, soko.tica <soko.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I've succesfully installed today the latest i386 snapshot on a usb flash >> > disk (on amd64 box), but the packages (e.g. links+, xfe ) report >> unresolved >> > dependencies and bad major. This is strange, since it is supposed that >> > older packages run on fresh -current install. >> >> It's normal that this happens from time to time with snapshots after a >> library update, it takes time to build packages, sign them and get them >> out to the mirrors. >> >> If you want to avoid this, watch source-changes and hold off on updating >> for a couple of days after a shared-library bump in base or X (commits >> involving shlib_version files). Increase "couple of days" in relation >> to the machine speed for slower arches. >> >> > Additionally, packages go through bulk builds before committing to the > ports tree. This might also cause a mismatch in the library versions. So > the bottom line is: the packages can be out of sync, try again later... > > Ugh, that wasn't worded properly. Proposed diffs of new versions of ports, which might break other ports, are also built, in a bulk build. This might cause mismatches...
