On 2015-10-28 15:32, Michael McConville wrote: > Andrei-Marius Radu wrote: >> >> Is there anyone else who thinks this is needed/a good idea ? > > For what it's worth, I was porting htop recently and I think I remember > it being painful to work without KERN_CPTIME2. I'd have to look back > (and look at this diff), though.
+1 on this, I would definitely find this useful. Michael, as far as I can tell KERN_CPTIME2 is already in the kernel. As I understand it, it is just support for access via sysctl(8) that is lacking. But maybe htop uses that rather than sysctl(3)? Doesn't seem likely though. Regards, /Benny
