By now the thread starter should already be well aware that the correct thing would have been to ask for some comforting words the report from the third party code audit was and is going to result in further improvements.
And then thank the developers for sharing the audit details, the work done so far and the immediate follow up and best effort to improve it all for the rest who don't have the skill, time or courage to work on a challenging project. Instead he chose to bitch, whine and insult the buddies who try to provide features in trade of more interest and exposure in real usage. It's a call for eyeballs, how much simple can it get, just try to contribute or be supportive, if you can't just shut up, Jason. Sure the OpenSMTPD is worthy of inclusion as it is in base, otherwise it would not be there. What kind of a nonsense question is this, rephrasing the old Confucius saying "be a man about it" does nothing but waste time and asks for a challenge response. Who needs this? Only someone trying to interfere or cause turmoil, so retreat your words or admit you tried causing damage and hope there is way to repair it. As nobody of interest in the internals of the featuritis involved, my best hopes, and certainly the wide groups of users, are the OpenSMTPD project makes it further and this is reassuring enough already.
