Surprised I've not had any replies for this? http://s12.postimg.org/i4pggq465/Open_BSDPFPacket_Flow.jpg <http://s12.postimg.org/i4pggq465/Open_BSDPFPacket_Flow.jpg>
I copied this from a diagram I found some years ago which has been photocopied a few times and is now intelligible, so thought I'd quickly re-do it. I can't believe nothing has changed in 5 years (I think thats when the original I saw was dated). Anyway, I try and message Henning directly and get his thoughts, and I'll post back here once its got his approval. Cheers, Andy. > On 23 Jun 2015, at 14:27, Andy Lemin <a...@brandwatch.com> wrote: > > Haha, Oops! thanks Doug.. > > Here it is instead.. > > http://s12.postimg.org/i4pggq465/Open_BSDPFPacket_Flow.jpg <http://s12.postimg.org/i4pggq465/Open_BSDPFPacket_Flow.jpg> > > Cheers, Andy. > > >> On 23 Jun 2015, at 14:13, Doug Hogan <d...@acyclic.org <mailto:d...@acyclic.org>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:56:17AM +0100, Andy Lemin wrote: >>> I was updating an old copy of the PF flow diagram I had lying around and >>> thought I'd post here quickly for comments / additions / corrections? >>> >>> Would be nice to update this and make it comprehensive as possible. >>> >>> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pdf which had a name of OpenBSDPFPacketFlow.pdf] >>> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of OpenBSDPFPacketFlow.jpeg] >> >> The attachments were stripped when sent to the list.
