Some time ago start getting errors after nightly Secutiry running: What problem can be?
Running security(8): Checking root sh paths, umask values: /etc/profile /root/.profile The root path includes . Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 356. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 356. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 369. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 369. Use of uninitialized value $home in -d at /usr/libexec/security line 386. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 406. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 434. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 434. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 434. Use of uninitialized value $home in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/libexec/security line 434. Thank you. Denis