On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:59:23 -0700 Abraham Al-Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On 12/12/05, Peter Hessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > : : > : Moving the static entries to outside the range is unfeasable right : > : now. And it doesn't address the issue of 'machine was on a : > : different dhcp network with an address that happens to be : > : staticly defined on ours'. : > : : > : Why does dhcpd give out addresses that are currently in use, and : > : why does it give out staticly defined addresses? Shouldn't it : > : remove the static entries from the dynamic pool? : : : Because you're static ips are within your dynamic pool, just setup : the static addresses so they're outside the dynamic range. Your : server is misconfigured otherwise. So its a feature, not a bug? Note the paragraph before the one you addressed, it says "can't happen". Would adding such a feature (maybe off by default, but configurable in command line/conf file) be accepted? -- "Here at the Phone Company, we serve all kinds of people; from Presidents and Kings to the scum of the earth ..."
