> > > You are speaking out of turn, basically insulting people who want > > > to make sure that older architectures do work. The Sun Fire V890 > > > and Niagara machines are not sparc architecture. They are > > > sparc64. > > > > > > > Not sure where the anger is coming from. Regardless, there may be > > people > > that are interested in running OpenBSD on a DEC alphaserver or even > > a > > Sun SparcStation 20 from 1996 and that may just be entertainment. I > > would hope that there was an interest in more modern architectures > > where > > OpenBSD may run very very well. > > Oh just shut up. > > I would hope you can keep your mouth shut when people talk about the > things they love to hack on. > > Because otherwise, you know, you might come off looking like you are > a self-entitled prick who only wants them to work on things you want, > you know?
Actually I was closely following the discussion on utf8 issues and found it interesting. OpenBSD is generally looked at as a serious and secure UNIX implementation and I was giving consideration to getting GCC 4.9.2 built ansd tested on it. I don't see results[1] in the GCC project for recent GCC and felt it would be of value to try. With a recent GCC it may have been possible to then build Apache 2.4.x and some other things that would allow an up to date set of tools to exist. These would allow a web site to run with great security and stability. Really that was my entire interest in OpenBSD. Oh, that and the LibreSSL work and OpenSSH of course. You, however, seem to feel a need to crash into a room like a mad man off his meds. Not sure what your intent is. What is it? Really? Dennis [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/buildstat.html
