Very true, filling your subterranean data server with angry hornets certainly seems like a good idea but it's really not, most AC maintenance contractors will charge you extra (usually per sting!).
Chester T. Field And remember when I left all the meat out because I saw Mr. David Lynch “I’m on TV” do it, and he got on TV from doin’ it, and I did it and didn’t get on TV from doin’ it? - Gandhi On 10/6/2014 at 1:37 PM, "Matti Karnaattu" <mkarnaa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Yes, my goal is to secure the >>infrastructure as much as possible. > >I don't know details but it sounds overly complex. And complexity >may cause other issues, without any benefit for security. > >Example, you don't have to encrypt your whole hard disk if the hard >disk is located in guarded bunker. But if you do that, it will >increase >security in theory but that may cause service outtage if you have >to >always locally type your crypt password if machine crashes. > >I would put this effort to ease maintainability, ease monitoring, >use stateful firewall, deploy honeypot etc. and avoid complexity.
