On 2014/09/05 03:49, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > 1. Don't use different _in and _out names, use syntax like "queue foo on > > em0" > > and "queue foo on em1". That way you assign packets to the correct queues on > > both interfaces in one step with something like "match to port 53 queue > > fast". > > The queue name is associated with the PF state; packets matching that state > > get assigned to that queue. > > > > Very useful recommendation, thanks. > > > 1a. Confirm your queue setup by running "systat queue" (as root) and > > making sure that you see packets assigned to the various queues that you > > have configured. > > Is there anyway to monitor "set prio" queues? my prio statements don't > seem to make > any effect...
"set prio" is not queues (except when it's on vlan interfaces, then it is transferred to vlan headers which *may* be handled as queues by your switch). > > 2. In my (admittedly very limited) testing with the new queueing system, > > it hasn't done very well with low bandwidth queues (ADSL type speeds) that > > used to work OK with altq (symptom, packets being assigned to queues as > > expected, but rates not being controlled). Next step in my testing there > > will be to build a kernel with a higher HZ value (faster timer) but > > I haven't got round to that yet. > > > > I've just started using queues today with: > > OpenBSD 5.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #364: Thu Sep 4 02:57:22 MDT 2014 > t...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP > > on my home ADSL link (6mbps down/700kbps up) and pf seems to be good at > managing queues as small as 100kbps. Good for you. It doesn't work at all for me like that.
