> See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/213697
I saw that link and I agree with it, but lets remember it only talks about the "install.conf" issue There are other issues like the SHA256.sig and index.txt files that are not addressed in that patch. >OpenBSD >installer is simple, you can "install" for example >i386 while >booting amd64 kernel and just >extract sets... I know, but I still think the distro ISO directory structure should not be architecture dependent. Absolutely any automated tool dealing with a distro ISO benefits from a constant directory structure > And you probably didn't >mention problem with "auto_install" as 'filename' :) > See http://devio.us/~jirib/pxelinux-openbsd.html That guy does something like Serva does and you are right. the autoinstall feature cannot depend on the name of the NBP that's really bad. Anyway as I said before OpenBSD is the only BSD flavor that is really close to have a distro ISO that can be easily integrated in a automated PXE environment, and that means more people giving it a try and getting it running in 5 minutes... hopefully these tiny details can be polished in feature versions. patpat
