On 2 June 2014 10:23, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote: > > Part of the deprecation / migration process is identifying the weird > ways people use vnd and finding solutions for them. But as we've seen, > people never move forward without the occasional push. >
So the most appropriate way to use vnd(4) as an encrypted container going forward would be to lay down softraid(4) CRYPTO inside it to achieve a like-for-like outcome or would this be over-complicating things? I have had success in testing this use case but I am aware it may not be supported.
