On 07/13/14 00:57, Артур Истомин wrote: > Good day! > > http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.shar is reliable source for setup anoncvs > for my own use? There have been some problems with cvs lately in tech > list.
yes, the problems were with cvsync, which is often used to replicate the mirror itself, and if you are running -current (as of, well, now) on a platform with a fast build time, you should be good. BUT... Some of the anoncvs servers have some pretty darned good performance -- the benefits of a local CVS repository can be minimal. I do this myself -- use a mirror I run rather than a local copy. If your repository is on an SSD, yes, you will have better local performance. If your respository is on a traditional disk, you may be wasting effort for lower performance than some repositories with SSD repo and mfs /tmp dirs. Also, if you are running your own local copy for just your use (i.e., not exposed to the public internet) rather than setting up a complete anoncvs mirror with chrooting and all, you may be just as or more happy with key-based (so you don't have to enter a PW) normal user access to a repository (the chrooting makes upgrades a little more "exciting" than they need be), or if you are developing on the same machine as your repository, just cvsync/rsync the entire repository to /cvs, and access it without ssh at all. Nick.
