On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:41:50PM -0600, Denny White wrote:
> 
> Have a question about the results of running
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/./out-of-date.
> Here is the output from it:
> Make sure your ports tree is up-to-date
> Generating specs
> Checking new package names
> Recording old package names
> Showing discrepancies
> --- /tmp/outdated.IJmN26992/old       Sat Dec  3 12:02:14 2005
> +++ /tmp/outdated.IJmN26992/new       Sat Dec  3 12:02:14 2005
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>   libiconv-1.9.2p1
>   libltdl-1.5.18
>   mergemaster-1.46p0
> -mozilla-firefox-1.0.6p3
> +mozilla-firefox-1.0.6p4
>   pine-4.63
>   png-1.2.8
>   tcl-8.4.7p1
> Before installing mozilla-firefox, running ./out-of-date
> showed nothing needing updating. I had installed the normal
> programs I use here at home. Pine, fetchmail, gnupg, gpgme,
> cvsup, mergemaster. No problems. I installed obsd 3.8 release
> off the cd along with src, sys, XF4, ports. Then did a cvsup
> to a local backup drive (complete tree), cd into /usr/src,
> ran `cvs -d$CVSROOT -rOPENBSD_3_8 up -Pd', did the same for
> /usr/ports & /usr/XF4, rebuilt kernel & installed & rebooted
> (everything worked ok), rebuilt userland making sure /usr/obj
> was clean & running beforehand the usual `cd /usr/src/etc &&
> env DESTDIR=/ make distrib-dirs' & after running `cd
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd && make -f Makefile.bsd-
> wrapper distribution' & then mergemaster, rebuilt /usr/XF4,
> everything still okay up to installing mozilla-firefox package.
> I haven't been building ports as I have no particular special
> needs to build in, just installing packages with
> `pkg_add ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.8/packages/i386/prog.tgz'.
> The same thing had happened previously when I had installed fluxbox.
> Blackbox didn't give the same problem, but now mozilla-firefox is.
> Here's uname -a output:

It is possible for packages to lag behind ports. Packages are slanted
towards -release, not -stable or -current, IIRC.

Anyway, just build Firefox from source if you want 1.0.6p4.

                Joachim

Reply via email to