On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:59:16AM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote: > The sysctl for carp.preempt controls if they should all fail at the same > time.
read carp(4). It contains answers to some questions asked. -Otto > Den 6 jul 2014 10:12 skrev "Adam Thompson" <athom...@athompso.net>: > > > On July 6, 2014 2:51:03 AM CDT, Mxher <o...@mxher.fr> wrote: > > >Le 06/07/2014 04:34, Giancarlo Razzolini a ??crit : > > >> Em 05-07-2014 16:20, Mxher escreveu: > > >>> 1) Can I group multiple virtuals ips to make them switch all at the > > >same > > >>> time using CARP ? > > >> AFAIK, no. But you can use ifstated. > > >I have to admit that I didn't knew about ifstated; I will test it. > > > > > >>> 2) About modems interfaces, I can't have them UP on both firewalls > > >at > > >>> the same time. > > >>> How would you managed that? > > >> You're dialing to your modems using pppoe? If so, them no, you > > >probably > > >> can't have both them up, even with carp. If you could change your > > >> configuration for routing instead, you could use carp on your > > >external > > >> interface to talk with your modems. > > >Yes, unfortunately I have to use pppoe on two (of the five) modems. > > > > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > > > > >Thanks for your answer! > > > > I recall someone pointing out that interface groups of carp interfaces > > will all transition simultaneously. I find ifconfig(8) inconclusive; run > > your own tests and if that works, you have a built-in solution for keeping > > all the carp interfaces in sync. > > Then, use ifstated to manage the pppoe interfaces depending on ifstate of > > the relevant wan interface? You could set up a carp interface with no IP > > address bound, set it into the common if group and it would go up/down with > > the other carp ifs. > > Maybe. I haven't tried anything like that myself. > > -Adam > > -- > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.