I do use it occasionally, and I don't run -current so I wouldn't have noticed any breakage yet. I don't rely on it, however, it's a convenience feature that I very occasionally use, and only manually when I do. I can live without it if it dies; it was never a fully-featured implementation IMHO anyway. -Adam
On June 22, 2014 4:22:16 PM CDT, Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >If you're currently using procfs, please respond with exactly what >parts of >it are actually needed by the programs you run. Without a good reason >to >keep it, it'll be deleted, as I broke listing of /proc back in January >and >no one has noticed, suggesting that no one is actually using it... > >Philip Guenther > > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >From: Philip Guenther <guent...@cvs.openbsd.org> >Date: Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:15 PM >Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src >To: source-chan...@cvs.openbsd.org > > >CVSROOT: /cvs >Module name: src >Changes by: guent...@cvs.openbsd.org 2014/06/22 15:15:51 > >Modified files: > sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC > >Log message: >PROCFS has been broken for months without complaints, so stop building >it > >suggested by sthen@ -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
