On 2014-05-14, Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote:

> There's no point in providing SHA256.sig for packages.

We provide the SHA256 file to allow bulk integrity checking of the
packages.  There may be little point in signing it, but signing it
also doesn't cost us anything, so why not?

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          na...@mips.inka.de

Reply via email to