Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> writes: >> but given that 'unlink' is already used in some scripts > > I would like to see some proof of that. > > The way I see it, the ports tree is a large enough ecosystem capable > of measuring whether something is in use. > > So, since it isn't in the ports tree, please show some proof.
The only port that we patch so that it calls rm -f instead of unlink at runtime is sysutils/gitolite. The patch has already been committed upstream. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
