> > Secondly, the proper way of doing nat, is using match rules, not pass. > > Why would you say that? 'pass ... nat-to ...' makes perfect sense to me. > Using "match" was an easy transition from the old nat rules, but being > "*the* proper way", no way.
I also believe that one-way-ism is disease. I don't need to prove the concept. Things change. One-way-ist's often succumb.
