If someone care the layout of book instead the content, he shouldn't read it.
If someone care the layout of OpenBSD website more than content, he
should change OS, & use some other, that got nice website.
At 12:20 2005-11-28, you wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:15:30PM +0100, Marcin Wilk said that
> Current website is veeeery useful.
> Useful don't have to be nice.
> From my poin of view it shows how OpenBSD is working. Maybe design
> isn't the most nice, but inside there is best documentation ever.
> The same is with OS itself. It's not the most nice OS (no flowers on
> letter, no clouds & angels on the KDE icons) but the power of source
> make it the most stable & secure OS around. So if website present how
> OS is.. Then it should not be changed.
but nobody talks about the content. the content is excellent!
would it be a sin to make it a little more pleasing to the eye?
a book can be very good inside, but if the form is disturbing
doesn't that make the reading experience weaker maybe
even nerving?
-f
--
dyslexics of the world: untie!
